Work Loss Data Institute
__________________________________
San Diego, CA

Corpus Christi, TX

 

Order ODG

ODG Product Line

FAQ's

Training Options

More about us
(corporate brochure)

News and Events

Advisory Board

Contact us

Employer Health Register

Home

 

 Utilizing ODG in Texas: A Short Instructional on

Implementation of the Division Treatment Guidelines  

Under the new disability management rules (Section 137.100) non-network healthcare provided on or after May 1, 2007 to workers injured on the job in Texas is to be in accordance with Official Disability Guidelines – Treatment in Workers’ Comp (ODG, ODG Treatment).  This article will serve as a short instructional from the publisher of ODG, Work Loss Data Institute, on how it is best implemented under §137.100

First of all, it is important to note that ODG in its entirety is a vast and far-reaching database of return-to-work guidelines, disability duration normative data, statistics on medical and indemnity costs in worker’ compensation, incidence and prevalence figures, and finally, treatment guidelines for work-related conditions.  The complete ODG product line is delivered in a three-volume textbook set recording over 4,100 pages, or on the Internet in a subscriber Web version representing over 200 megabytes of content.  Of course, one needn’t be overwhelmed.  As logic would have it, ODG is broken into three distinct sections – guidelines for Treatment, Duration and Impairment.  Each section is then further divided by diagnosis or body part, and so forth.  With respect to §137.100, it is one section in particular – ODG Treatment – that is now pegged to be applied by rule.

ODG Treatment is broken into 16 core chapters (Ankle/Foot, Burns, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Elbow, Eye, Fitness for Duty, Forearm/Wrist/Hand, Head, Hernia, Hip/Pelvis, Knee/Leg, Low Back, Neck/Upper Back, Pain, Shoulder, Stress/Mental).  Each chapter is broken into three sections, Treatment Planning, Codes for Automated-Approval, and Procedure Summary.  In addition, the ODG Treatment UR Advisor is available to users of the Web version.  These sections are dissected below in order of relevance.

ODG Treatment UR Advisor

            Description

Because it is organized by ICD9 diagnosis code, this section is linked into Section B of the site.  The link opens a mapping of CPT codes to the ICD9 based on recommendations from ODG Treatment and actual workers’ compensation claims data representing about 2 million claims and almost 50 million paid invoices covering about 10 billion dollars in actual incurred medical costs.  Data is provided on frequency, incidence, number of visits and cost, plus the ODG treatment Bill Review Payment Flag.

            Significance

Most significant is the Bill Review Payment Flag, labeled Green, Yellow, Red or Black, meaning the following:  Green = OK to auto-pay up to ODG CAA max number of visits.  Yellow = OK to auto-pay up to 25th percentile (or 50th percentile for more liberal policy) number of visits.  Red = Need to review.  Black or Not listed = Need to review.  The ODG Treatment UR Advisor is designed to streamline the UR process.  Further manual review should be done using Procedure Summaries.  The primary purpose of the ODG Treatment UR Advisor is to facilitate early access to the right treatment for injured workers.  There are many treatments, diagnostic tests, and provider visits where the best thing the insurance reviewer can do is get out of the way and let the doctors treat. The UR Advisor lets them do that, and also frees up the reviewers’ time to handle the more complex situations where their education and experience can be used to best advantage.  Within the list of procedure codes in the UR Advisor, there are many medical codes that are lacking the support of quality medical studies, but based on actual claims data, these codes are very common for the diagnosis being reviewed, their outcomes are good, and the total costs are not excessive. Examples may include additional office visits for other specialist opinions, relatively minor laboratory tests when the treating doctor suspects another diagnosis, simple repairs of superficial wounds when the diagnosis is an open wound, etc.  These are cases where there should be no delay in treatment just because a reviewer cannot find a specific entry in the Procedure Summary.  These codes are typically Yellow in the UR Advisor, which indicates to auto-pay up to the 25th percentile in number of visits.

 

Procedure Summary

             Description

This is the most important section of ODG.  Listed here alphabetically are all possible therapies, including surgeries, physical medicine modalities, diagnostic and imaging tests, and virtually any other treatment or procedure that might be considered for each condition or body part.  Beside each is a recommendation for appropriate use, if any, along with a summary of the supporting medical evidence.  Links are also provided to abstracts of the cited references, which are ranked and weighted alphanumerically.

            Significance

 

This is where the “teeth” of the rule lie.  The Procedure Summary is generally where an insurance carrier or a medical provider will look to determine if a given intervention is supported by adequate medical evidence and therefore recommended as an option.  Each entry will begin with one of the following three terms: “Recommended…”, “Not Recommended…” or in some cases, “Under Study”.  It will then specify patient selection criteria, clinical criteria, or other treatment plan that should be applied or considered.

 

Treatment Planning

 

            Description

This is presented as an ideal case plan, indicating selected interventions recommended for each visit, along with timing for these visits.  The Treatment Planning section is only a recommendation.  It is NOT to be used as a rigid protocol applied in all cases.

            Significance

Healthcare providers may choose to follow the Treatment Planning section at their own discretion.  They may also consider interventions outside of the Treatment Planning section.  When doing this, they should verify these interventions are recommended as options in the Procedure Summary.  An insurance carrier should not use the absence of a particular therapy from the Treatment Planning section as a basis to deny care.

Codes for Automated Approval

             Description

This is presented as an optional tool to streamline the UR process.  Codes for Automated Approval maps procedure codes to diagnosis codes with a field indicator for maximum occurrences for auto-approval.  This is does not constitute a recommendation.

            Significance

Insurance carriers and utilization review companies may choose to streamline their processes by automatically approving procedures in the Codes for Automated Approval section.  However, this is at their discretion.  The interventions here may have specific patient selection criteria – found in the Procedure Summary – that may also be applied.  The “maximum occurrences” listed here are for the purpose of auto-approval only.  Additional therapy may be recommended / allowed for in the Procedure Summary.

Each of the above sections is presented distinctly in the chapters of ODG Treatment in Workers’ Comp.  These are the focus of §137.100, particularly the Procedure Summaries.

Complimentary with ODG Treatment in Workers’ Comp comes the standard version of Official Disability Guidelines.  Official Disability Guidelines provides disability duration or return-to-work guidelines for every reportable condition based on severity, treatment and type of job, organized by ICD-9 diagnosis code.  Within this section there are lists of every possible treatment for each condition, hyper-linked to the listing in the Procedure Summary of the appropriate chapter of ODG Treatment, so this section can facilitate access to the treatment guidelines adopted under §137.100 by ICD-9 code.  Also included are workers’ comp cost tables (medical, indemnity and total), recommendations for activity modification, causality likelihood, age adjustment factors, average hospital costs and length of stay, ICD-10 translations, and normative data on time away from work in tabular or graphical form representing over 10 million cases.  While not directly related to §137.100, users may find significant value in this information as well.

In summary, with respect to §137.100, the most important sections of Official Disability Guidelines – Treatment in Workers’ Comp are the Procedure Summaries within ODG Treatment.  This is where treatment and utilization review decisions based on ODG should be considered.  That said, while guidelines can assist clinicians in making treatment decisions and help insurance carriers make reimbursement determinations, they cannot take into account the uniqueness of each patient's clinical circumstances.  As such, they should not be used as the sole evidence for an absolute standard of care.  Given that they are evidence-based and sufficiently current, however, they should carry significant weight, and in the form of ODG Treatment they do under §137.100.

Official Disability Guidelines – Treatment in Workers’ Comp is available in textbook and Web-based format from Work Loss Data Institute.   The Web version is the official "current" edition of ODG at any point in time according to TDI DWC.

Questions?  Contact ODG Helpdesk at ODG@worklossdata.com

 

Send mail to our webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2007 Work Loss Data Institute
Last modified: October 03, 2007